Detecting Distress Discussion Paper
Detecting Distress Discussion Paper
Article:
O’Connor, M., Tanner, P., Miller, L., Watts, K., & Musiello, T. (2017). Detecting distress: Introducing routine screening in a gynecological cancer setting. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 21(1), 79-85.
Discussion:
The article acknowledges that distress (including nervousness, worry, fears, fatigue ad sleep problems) among patients could have a negative impact on health care outcomes among cancer patients. Applying a mixed methodology design that collected data using quantitative and qualitative approaches, the results presented in the article note that at least 66% of gynecologic cancer patients require follow-up or referral care to address the high distress reported among them. Given these results, it is clear that 66% of gynecologic cancer patients would have unmet care needs if distress care is not provided within their health care packages. Two recommendations can be made to improve nursing practice based on the reported results. Firstly, routine screening for distress should be provided for gynecologic cancer patients since more than half of them report distress as an unmet need. Secondly, distress care should be provided as part of gynecologic cancer care package since this has a profound impact on overall health care outcomes with a negative impact if not addressed. Detecting Distress Discussion Paper
ORDER A FREE -PAPER HERE
The research evidence would be disseminated to peers through forums that seek to inform and convince them. This would include discussion forums and presentations where the key statistics and outcomes of the research would be presented with a focus on improving health care practice. In fact, the communication lays the ground work for applying the evidence while offering opportunities for improving practice outcomes. The approaches for disseminating evidence are selected because these peers have deep knowledge of the health care issue, have low to moderate decision making ability, and have spent a long time deliberating on the particular issue. In addition, the evidence would be based on personal experiences, experience from the field, evidence reviews, and science. These qualities inherent in peers make discussion forums and presentations the more appropriate approaches for communicating nursing research evidence. Detecting Distress Discussion Paper
