Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay

Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay

Matrix Worksheet Template

 

Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Clinical issue of interest is living with and controlling the risk of breast cancer. Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay

 

Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Sukartini, T., & Sari, Y. I. P. (2021). Women with breast cancer living with one breast after a mastectomy. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 12(2), 366-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0012

 

 

Keesing, S., Rosenwax, L., & McNamara, B. (2018). The implications of women’s activity limitations and role disruptions during breast cancer survivorship. Women’s health (London, England), 14, 1745505718756381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745505718756381 Tan, M-M., Ho, W-K., Yoon, S-Y., Mariapun, S., Hasan, S. N., Lee, DS-C., … & Teo, S-H. (2018). A case-control study of breast cancer risk factors in 7,663 women in Malaysia. PLoS ONE, 13(9), e0203469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203469 Sharma, D., & Singh, G. (2017). Breast cancer in young women: A retrospective study from tertiary care center of north India. South Asian Journal of Cancer, 6(2), 51-53. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.208859
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) The article explores how women perceive their body after a mastectomy following a cancer diagnosis. The article explores the effect of breast cancer on survivors. It identifies what survivors of breast cancer should expect in their life. The article identifies the risk factors for breast cancer among women. The implication is that controlling the risk factors could reduce the risk of breast cancer. The article explores the occurrence of breast cancer, reporting on how it affects the patients. This offers an understanding of disease prognosis.
Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article The aim of this study was to explore the impact of mastectomy on the body image of women with breast cancer.

BUY NOW A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The aim of this study was to explore the challenges of women and their partners as they attempted to resume activities and roles, identify unmet needs and make recommendations regarding a suitable framework to support women and partners to recommence valued activities and important roles during early survivorship. The aim of this study was to examine breast cancer risk factors and the change of selected risk factors across birth cohorts in Malaysian women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of age on prognosis of breast cancer in women above and under 40 years of age.
Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. Qualitative methodology with a phenomenological approach with the participants subjected to interviews that explores their experiences and the meanings they attribute to the experiences.

 

 

 

 

 

Qualitative methodology that subjected participants to interviews and focus groups with the results subjected to thematic analysis. A case control study approach that applied a quantitative methodology to recruit 7,660 over a period of 14 years. A retrospective research approach that applied a quantitative methodology to evaluate the medical records of breast cancer patients.
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. The qualitative method can identify new and emerging themes. It has high reliability and validity as there is stability of responses with the interview records enhancing the reliability and validity. The qualitative approach has the strength of identifying new and emerging themes that may have not been apparent at the beginning of the research. In addition, there is high reliability and validity as there is stability of responses as enhanced by recordings of the interviews and focus group. The case control approach has the strength of recruiting a large number of participants and recording a large amount of data. The methodology is reliable and valid because it collects the data required in the research (data was collected for the function of the research) and eliminates selection bias. The retrospective study has the strength of accumulating data for a large number of patients. The data was collected for 425 over four years. The methodology presents validity and reliability concerns because key data may be missing, the data was collected for a different function (medical records), and it could suffer from selection bias.
General Notes/Comments This study was conducted in Surabaya, and may not be generalizable for other areas.

 

This study was conducted in Perth, Western Australia, and may not be generalizable for other areas. This study was conducted in Malaysia and may not be generalizable for other areas. The study was for north India, and may not be generalizable for other areas.

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role. Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following:After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following:

    *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format

    *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

    *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article

    *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.
    The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

Resources:

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 33–54)
  • Chapter 21, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 607–653) Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay

    BUY HERE TODAY

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2. Nursing Standard, 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488

Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z. (2012). Understanding quantitative research: Part 1. Nursing Standard, 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485

Walden University Library. (n.d.-a). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

Walden University Library. (n.d.-b). Evaluating resources: Primary & secondary sources. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources

Walden University Library. (n.d.-f). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean

Walden University Library. (n.d.-g). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Introduction to keyword searching. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/searching-basics

Walden University Library. (n.d.-i). Quick Answers: What are filtered and unfiltered resources in nursing? Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/73299

Rubric:

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay

*The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format

*A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

*A brief description of the aims of the research of each article

*A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.–

Excellent 81 (81%) – 90 (90%)

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format.

The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research.

The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research.

The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples.

The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

Good 72 (72%) – 80 (80%)

The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format.

The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research.

The responses accurately describe the aims of the research.

The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies essay

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
hiw 01
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Nursing Papers Writer
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
Trustpilot
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat