Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness Essay

Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness Essay

Week 1: Discussion.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an analysis and synthesis-level evaluation of the factors that influence both contemporary advanced practice nursing and the time-period of transition that occurs within the first year of clinical practice. Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness Essay

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  1. Reflect on the elements of successful transition from Registered Nurse to Advanced Practice Registered Nurse. (CO 5)
  2. Evaluate the patient-centered medical home, value-based payment, and interdisciplinary care models espoused by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) and its’ impact on the quality of healthcare. (CO 2, 5)

Requirements:

Part 1: Using Brown and Olshansky’s (1997) model, describe what interventions you plan to do during your first year of practice to help you navigate the changes described during in each phase.

Part 2: We are seeing rapid change in primary care as stakeholders are demanding higher quality healthcare at reduced costs. After reading the Cuenca (2017) and Shi, et al. (2017) articles, provide a synthesis-level evaluation of how you believe the patient-centered medical home and value-based payment models will: (1) impact your personal practice as a nurse practitioner, and (2) transform the way primary care is delivered in the United States.

Part 3: After reading the AANP (2015) and White, et al. (2017) articles, what are your thoughts on the economic benefits of using nurse practitioners in healthcare practices? How would you respond to this question if asked in a job interview? Support your response in Part 3 with evidence from the literature. Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness Essay

Articles:

Shi, L., Lee, D., Chung, M., Liang, H., Lock, D., & Sripipatana, A. (2017). Patient-centered medical home recognition and clinical performance in U.S. community health centers. Health Services Research, 52(3), 984-1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12523

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441497/

 

White, D.L., Torabi, E., & Froehle, C.M. (2017). Icebreaker vs. standalone: comparing alternative workflow modes of mid-level care providers. Production and Operations Management, 26(11), 2089-2106.

 

American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2015). Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/position-statements.

 

Brown, M., & Olshansky, E. (1997). From limbo to legitimacy: a theoretical model of the transition to the primary care nurse practitioner role. Nursing Research, 46(1), 46-51. https://uw.instructure.com/courses/812898/files/22971045/download

  BUY  HERE TODAY

Cuenca, A.E. (2017). Preparing for value-based payment: five essential skills for success. Family Practice Management, 24(3), 25-30. https://www.aafp.org/fpm/2017/0500/p25.html

 

Week 1 Discussion Grading Rubric

Week 1 Discussion Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Knowledge

Student discusses the stages of the Brown and Olshansky model and interventions necessary to navigate each state; and,

Student discusses the risks and benefits of the patient-centered medical home model for the APRN working in primary care; and,

Student discusses the risks and benefits of the value-based care models for the APRN working in primary care; and, Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness Essay

Student analyzes impact of payment models on the delivery of primary care; and,

Using the weekly readings plus one outside resource, the student analyzes the economic benefit (or risk) of using APRNs in primary care practices.

25.0 pts

Excellent

All 5 elements are present

23.0 pts

Very Good

1 element is missing

21.0 pts

Satisfactory

2 elements are missing

13.0 pts

Needs Improvement

3-4 elements are missing

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

5 elements are missing

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Support of Research & Interactive Dialogue

Discussion post is supported with appropriate sources*^; and,

Source is published within the last 5 years; and,

Reference list is provided and in-text citations match; and,

Student provides a substantive** response to at least one topic-related post of a peer; and,

Student responds to all direct faculty questions OR if student was not asked a direct question student responds to either a 2nd peer post or a faculty question directed towards another student
* Textbooks, non-US journals, nursing journals not intended for advanced practice providers.
^ State specific websites from regulatory boards are acceptable)
** A substantive post adds new content or insights to the discussion thread and information from student’s original post is not reused in peer or faculty response

20.0 pts

Excellent

All 5 elements are present

18.0 pts

Very Good

1 element is missing

16.0 pts

Satisfactory

2 elements are missing

13.0 pts

Needs Improvement

3-4 elements are missing

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

5 elements are missing

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion Format
5.0 pts

Excellent

Discussion post contains 0-2 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format

4.0 pts

Very Good

Discussion post contains 3-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

Discussion post contains 6-8 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussion post contains 9-11 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion post contains 12 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion late penalty deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0) Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness Essay

0.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Total Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

0.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0 Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness Essay

 

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
hiw 01
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Nursing Papers Writer
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
Trustpilot
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat