Nursing Research Article Critique Paper
Nursing Research Article Critique Paper
Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.
Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.
Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.
Describe the research in greater detail.
Include your observations about this question.
Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.
Discuss the research design of the study.
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.
You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words
Describe the sample.
Briefly describe the sample size used for this study
Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.
Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.
Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words Nursing Research Article Critique Paper
Describe the data collection method(s)’
Who collected the data?
What tools were used?
What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified?
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the limitations of the study.
Identify the limitations within the study
Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies
Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
ORDER A FREE-PLAGIARISM PAPER NOW
Describe the findings reported in the study.
Describe the findings reported in the study
Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study
Discuss the credibility of the findings
If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Summary
Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.
Include a statement about the research question and the findings.
Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice?
End with a concluding statement.
Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this? ” and then cite the source.
Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paper as (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references.
Article: “Hanson, H., Schroeter, K., Hanson, A., Asmus, K., & Grossman, A. (2013). Preferences for photographic art among hospitalized patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 40, E337-E345. doi:10.1188/13.ONF.E337-E345”
Introduction
Hanson et al. (2013) is a nine-page journal article that discusses the results of a study to determine if cancer patients have a preference for photographic art they view. Additionally, it sought to determine how viewing photographic art affected their health. The study was necessitated by the acknowledgement that alternative and complementary therapies have value in the management of cancer. The authors further mention that photography has the potential for improving the patients’ quality of life. This was particularly true for those who were advised not to go outdoors either for physical health, mental health and recovery reasons. In this respect, the research anticipates that photographs will be identified as useful therapy tools for cancer patients due to their aesthetic and comfort values (Hanson et al., 2013)Nursing Research Article Critique Paper.
Research Question
Hanson et al. (2013) identified five questions. The first question asked how cancer patients viewed photographs. The second question asked what the patients’ general predisposition was towards photographs was. The third question sought to categorize photographs in terms of the patients’ preferences. The fourth question sought to categorize photographs in terms of the patients’ aversion. The final photograph asked for the photograph delivery formats that patients preferred. Answering these questions would identify how patients approach photographs use in therapy and whether the specific photograph format would affect cancer management outcomes. In this respect, the five questions are appropriate for the research study (Hanson et al., 2013).
ORDER A FREE-PLAGIARISM PAPER NOW
Design of the Study
Hanson et al. (2013) applied a quantitative exploratory descriptive design to collect primary data. This occurred in a single-group that included a post-test approach. In addition, qualitative survey questions were included. In this case, the design first identified medical facilities that treated cancer patients as the location from which to recruit participants following advice from nurses. This was then followed by the recruitment after which the participants were subjected to a pre-structured survey. The collected data were then subjected to statistical analysis (Hanson et al., 2013). The study design is appropriate since it allowed the research to recruit the right participants, and subjected them to a pre-qualified data collection tool. Besides that, it shows how the data was evaluated to arrive at its conclusions. In this respect, the study design identified the important aspects of the five research questions then presented a strategy for collecting data to answer these questions (Treiman, 2014).
Sample/Population of the Study
The study first approached 90 persons who had been hospitalized with cancer. The inclusion criteria was being older than 18 years, admitted for oncology services for at least 24 hours, being medically stable, speaking English, providing consent and capacity to visually view photographs in a computer screen. 80 participants were finally recruited into the study to include 44 men and 36 women with an average age of 49 years with the oldest being 85 years and the youngest being 19 years. All the participants had been hospitalized for cancer treatment (Hanson et al., 2013). The study sample is appropriate since it was recruited from a cancer treatment center that catered to the population of interest. Besides that, 80 participants is an appropriate number that would provide robust estimates. However, there was a limitation since the participants were recruited from a single cancer treatment center. They should have been recruited from different cancer treatment centers to ensure that the results were representative of patients across all treatment centers (Creswell, 2013)Nursing Research Article Critique Paper.
Data Collection Methods
The primary data collection method entailed having the participants complete a survey that included quantitative and qualitative elements. This required that the participants first view photographs presented on a computer screen before completing the five-instrument electronic survey that collected their opinions on the photographs and viewing experience (Hanson et al., 2013). The data collection method can be considered appropriate since it collected the required data. In this case, the study intention was to evaluate the value of photographs in cancer management. For that matter, having cancer patients view photographs then present their opinion on their value met the research intention. Additionally, the data collection was conducted via an online administered survey to imply that there was very little room for data manipulation during the collection process unless it was done intentionally (Mackey & Gass, 2015). In this respect, the data collection method was appropriate.
Limitations
The study identified two limitations that hindered the data collection process. Firstly, although 146 persons were eligible to participate in the study, 66 of them opted not to participate while only 80 participated. This disconnect between eligible persons and the number that finally participated was blamed on staffing limitations, increasing illness, and refusal. Secondly, the participants were recruited from a single facility to imply that the results could only apply that that facility (Hanson et al., 2013). The first limitation can be addressed by improving staffing and addressing the patient concerns that hindered them from participation. The second concern can be addressed by recruiting participants from more than one facility Nursing Research Article Critique Paper.
Findings
80 participants were recruited of which 44 were men while 36 were women. They had an average age of 49 years with the youngest being 19 years while the oldest were 8 years. 96% of the participants enjoyed viewing photographs with landscape photographs of natural scenes being the most preferred. Scenes of human activity were most rejected. Qualitatively, their order of priority began with landscapes, followed by animals, people, entertainment, imagery, water, spiritual, flowers, and landmark (Hanson et al., 2013). The results are a clear indication that cancer patients enjoy viewing photographs to imply that it improves their mood. Also, it showed that cancer patients have preferences for photographic scenes.
Summary of the Article
The article presents the results of a study to determine if cancer patients have a preference for photographic art they view, and how viewing photographic art affected their health. Five research questions were identified to match the study intentions. It applied a quantitative exploratory descriptive design to collect primary data. This entailed having the participants complete a survey that included quantitative and qualitative elements after viewing photographs. The results showed that cancer patients enjoy viewing photographs, and they have preferences for photographic scenes.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hanson, H., Schroeter, K., Hanson, A., Asmus, K., & Grossman, A. (2013). Preferences for photographic art among hospitalized patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 40, E337-E345. doi:10.1188/13.ONF.E337-E345.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: methodology and design. London: Routledge.
Treiman, D. J. (2014). Quantitative data analysis: Doing social research to test ideas. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons Nursing Research Article Critique Paper.
