analyze how perceptions of justice may be influenced by class distinctions : 5 important facts to note

Analyze how perceptions of justice may be influenced by class distinctions

Justice and Socio-Economic Class. In Chapter 2 of the textbook, the author describes meanings for the concept of socio-economic class and analyzes how perceptions of justice may be influenced by class distinctions in American society (see Section 2.4).

He also references the related views of two provocative and thought-provoking contemporary scholars. Robert H. Frank provides an economic analysis, and Charles Murray offers a socio-cultural interpretation.

In this discussion, you will summarize the perspective of one of these scholars and evaluate its relevance to understanding how class influences beliefs about justice. perceptions of justice

Review the questions below and select one (only one) of these scholars as the focus of your initial post.

a. Robert H. Frank. Debates about distributive justice among economic classes often characterize the outlook of the rich as libertarian, the views of the poor as egalitarian, and the perspective of the middle-class as utilitarian.

This over-simplified framework may translate into conflicting ideologies about the role of government in achieving economic justice. perceptions of justice

On one extreme are libertarian proponents of the free market and on the other extreme are egalitarian proponents of socialism. In the middle are a variety of “mixed” approaches to the role of government in the economy that promote utilitarian concepts of distributive justice – the greatest good for the greatest possible number of people. Cornell University economist Robert Frank, in his recent provocative book, perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice perceptions of justice

The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good, rejects – but not completely – both the libertarian and egalitarian extremes. Instead, he advocates a new role for government that encourages individuals toward self-interested economic behavior that also advances the economic welfare of all members of the community.

In your initial post, summarize Frank’s arguments – both his criticism of the libertarian and egalitarian extremes. Then, analyze his proposals on how to achieve greater economic justice for the whole community.

Finally, evaluate the relevance or usefulness of his views for understanding how economic class differences may influence perceptions of distributive justice.

Do you think his views may be appreciated as just by rich people? Poor people? Middle-class people? Explain your conclusion.

To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following resources in the order they are listed:

§ Darwin, the market whiz

§ Robert Frank on “the Darwin economy”

§ Robert Frank: “The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good” [Radio broadcast]

b. Charles Murray. Commutative justice rests on a shared understanding of the rights and responsibilities of all parties to the basic social contract that holds a society together.

On one level, the U.S. Constitution might be characterized as part of the social contract on which the American political system is based.

But on a deeper, more fundamental, level, the social contract includes shared values which shape our expectations of others and ourselves with respect to morality, culture, self-reliance, and collective responsibility.

Charles Murray, a political scientist at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, calls into question the relevance of the social contract which he sees as the source of “the founding virtues” on which American civic life depends.

In his recent provocative book, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010, he argues that “Our nation is coming apart at the seams” – “not ethnic seams, but the seams of class” (Confessore, 2012).

He focuses on what he sees as the social and moral collapse of the white working class and the growing cultural gap between them and the white upper class.

In your initial post, summarize Murray’s description of the white working class and the white upper class. Also, analyze the basis for his pessimistic outlook about government’s ability to solve this problem and re-invigorate America’s social contract.

Finally, evaluate the relevance or usefulness of his views for understanding how socio-economic class differences may influence perceptions of commutative justice.

Do the white working class and the white upper class no longer have a shared understanding of the rights and responsibilities of the basic social contract?

Explain your conclusion. To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following resources in the order they are listed:

§ Tramps like them: Charles Murray examines the white working class in ‘Coming Apart’

§ Can the working class be saved?

§ Charles Murray on white America [Radio broadcast]

 

in American society (see Section 2.4). He also references the related views of two provocative and thought-provoking contemporary scholars.

Robert H. Frank provides an economic analysis, and Charles Murray offers a socio-cultural interpretation.

In this discussion, you will summarize the perspective of one of these scholars and evaluate its relevance to understanding how class influences beliefs about justice.

Review the questions below and select one (only one) of these scholars as the focus of your initial post.

a. Robert H. Frank. Debates about distributive justice among economic classes often characterize the outlook of the rich as libertarian, the views of the poor as egalitarian, and the perspective of the middle-class as utilitarian.

This over-simplified framework may translate into conflicting ideologies about the role of government in achieving economic justice.

On one extreme are libertarian proponents of the free market and on the other extreme are egalitarian proponents of socialism. In the middle are a variety of “mixed” approaches to the role of government in the economy that promote utilitarian concepts of distributive justice – the greatest good for the greatest possible number of people.

Cornell University economist Robert Frank, in his recent provocative book, The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good, rejects – but not completely – both the libertarian and egalitarian extremes.

Instead, he advocates a new role for government that encourages individuals toward self-interested economic behavior that also advances the economic welfare of all members of the community.

In your initial post, summarize Frank’s arguments – both his criticism of the libertarian and egalitarian extremes. Then, analyze his proposals on how to achieve greater economic justice for the whole community.

Finally, evaluate the relevance or usefulness of his views for understanding how economic class differences may influence perceptions of distributive justice.

Do you think his views may be appreciated as just by rich people? Poor people? Middle-class people? Explain your conclusion.

  To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following resources in the order they are listed:

§ Darwin, the market whiz

§ Robert Frank on “the Darwin economy”

§ Robert Frank: “The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good” [Radio broadcast]

b. Charles Murray. Commutative justice rests on a shared understanding of the rights and responsibilities of all parties to the basic social contract that holds a society together.

On one level, the U.S. Constitution might be characterized as part of the social contract on which the American political system is based.

But on a deeper, more fundamental, level, the social contract includes shared values which shape our expectations of others and ourselves with respect to morality, culture, self-reliance, and collective responsibility.

Charles Murray, a political scientist at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, calls into question the relevance of the social contract which he sees as the source of “the founding virtues” on which American civic life depends.

In his recent provocative book, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010, he argues that “Our nation is coming apart at the seams” – “not ethnic seams, but the seams of class” (Confessore, 2012).

He focuses on what he sees as the social and moral collapse of the white working class and the growing cultural gap between them and the white upper class.

In your initial post, summarize Murray’s description of the white working class and the white upper class. Also, analyze the basis for his pessimistic outlook about government’s ability to solve this problem and re-invigorate America’s social contract.

Finally, evaluate the relevance or usefulness of his views for understanding how socio-economic class differences may influence perceptions of commutative justice.

Do the white working class and the white upper class no longer have a shared understanding of the rights and responsibilities of the basic social contract? Explain your conclusion.

To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following resources in the order they are listed:

§ Tramps like them: Charles Murray examines the white working class in ‘Coming Apart’

§ Can the working class be saved?

§ Charles Murray on white America [Radio broadcast]

 

perceptions of justice
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 7% with the discount code NPW7