Use of Electronic Health Records and Standardized Terminologies Essays
Use of Electronic Health Records and Standardized Terminologies Essays
201WK7Asign: Critique Article
An article critique provides a critical evaluation of the article through intensive analysis to include a summary of the article. In fact, it helps the audience/readers to understand the key points in the article and the ideas the author sought to express/communicate. In addition, it offers an indication of the perceived success of the article while analyzing its strengths and weaknesses. Besides that, it analyzes the interesting and important points in the article while developing explanations that interpret the intentions of the author. Furthermore, it summarizes and evaluates the value of the article while stating any agreements or disagreements with the author, with supporting evidence (Schmidt & Brown, 2019). This paper presents an article critique of a journal article by De Groot and others. Use of Electronic Health Records and Standardized Terminologies Essays
BUY NOW A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Overview of the study
The article, “Use of electronic health records and standardized terminologies: A nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences”, by De Groot and others seeks to present the results of a nationwide survey among nursing staff to explore their experiences with the use of electronic health records and standardized terminologies. The research problem being address is whether nursing staff actually feel supported, in providing nursing care, by the use of electronic health records that include standardized terminologies. The abstract makes it clear that this is not a simply issue, showing that it has implications for the standardized terminologies that nursing staff use, extent to which they feel supported by the use of electronic health records, and extent to which the support is associated with the standardized terminologies used in electronic health records. Applying a primary research approach that subjected nursing staff to a web-based questionnaire, the study revealed that only about half of nursing staff use standardized terminologies in their electronic health records. In addition, the results revealed that nursing staff feel supported by the use of electronic health records in their nursing activities as they provide care. Besides that, the nursing staff were unclear whether the nursing information in the electronic health records were accurate, relevant, complete, and user friendly. Based on the study results, the recommendation is made that electronic health records should have a user-friendly design with a focus on ensuring that standardized terminologies used have a positive impact on the extent to which nursing staff feel supported by the use of electronic health records (De Groot et al., 2020).
Strengths of the study
There are three strengths of the study. First, targeted issue is well addressed as it collects primary data in regards to a specific problem/issue at hand. It makes use of procedures that fit the problem best thus allowing the researchers to concentrate and address the issue specific to the situation in the selected facility/organization. With this approach, it is possible to reveal problems for which timely remedial measures may be instituted in the facility (Hall & Roussel, 2022). Second, it offers unbiased information. It makes use of primary data that is less subjective and more objective since it is extracted from a sample recruited from the population. There are no misleading information or personal biases. This justifies that it is easy to measure the reliability and validity of the data. In essence, the study obtains first-hand information from the field, information that is trustworthy and valid. The methods applied in analyzing and interpreting the data are valid and reasonably suitable for the data type thereby making the primary data collection more authentic (Suresh, 2018). Third, it makes use of a questionnaire that is reliable as it facilitates full participation of the nursing staff. This makes it easier to understand their perceptions, opinions, experiences, attitudes and feelings towards the particularly issue/problem. The questionnaire is standardized in that the same questions are posed to the participants. This ensures consistency thus making the results reliable (Grove & Gray, 2022). Use of Electronic Health Records and Standardized Terminologies Essays
Weakness of the study
There are three weaknesses of the study. First, it does not provide a basis for comparison. This is unlike secondary research that compares ideas from different sources with a focus on solving a problem and proving that the solution is more efficient and effective for the targeted issue. Although documents can tremendously vary in quality, secondary research engages many documents, such as papers, books, articles and journals written by professionals that may be more valuable than responses from a questionnaire (Kaakinen et al., 2018). Second, the methodology (questionnaire) lacks depths. The questionnaire is standardized, thus making it difficult to ask any additional questions other than very general questions that a broad range of participants can understand. Due to the general nature of the questions, the results may not be as valid as would be the case other methods were used to comprehensively collect information, such as use of interviews that allow the research to comprehensively examine the issue being researched. Third, the methodology is inflexible. If during the course of the study, the researchers discovered that some of the questions were not well phrased or that additional questions were needed, then it would be too late to make changes if responses have started coming in. at this state, it is too late as some of the responses would be coming in, such that making a change to the questions or doing a do-over would not be possible. An in-depth interview preempts this weakness as it allows the researcher to provide further explanation for confusing questions and even tweak the questions they learn more about how the participants seem to understand the questions (Gray & Grove, 2020).
The critique identifies three strengths and weaknesses of the research that can be targeted to improve the quality of the study. First, narrowing the targeted issue so that it addresses a specific problem. The study looks at whether nurses feel supporting in providing nursing care by the use of electronic health records that include standardized terminologies. This is a broad issue since the standardized terminologies are not specified. The study topic should be narrowed down to addressing the issue of whether nurses feel supporting in providing nursing care by the use of electronic health records. Second, ensuring that the study offers unbiased, objective information obtained from a sample of the population. The web-based approach ensures that a large number of participants is reached but it is unclear whether the participants are from the population of interest. An offline questionnaire may be more appropriate for reaching the target population (Suresh, 2018). Third, continuing to use a standardized questionnaire that presents reliable results as all the participants are subjected to the same questions. Fourth, providing a basis for comparison by having a more in-depth discussion of the results in relation to knowledge from other publications. Fifth, presenting questions with depth to include having open-ended questions that can explore emerging themes. Sixth, including interviews alongside the questionnaire as this can allow for the questions to be tweaked even as the participant is engaged (Grove & Gray, 2022). Use of Electronic Health Records and Standardized Terminologies Essays
Implications for nursing practice
The article argues for the development of user-friendly electronic health records designs. It notes that only about 56% of nursing staff use standardized terminology in their electronic health records. The standardized terminology used are varied. This makes it clear that electronic health records design should support the use of different standardized terminologies. In addition, the electronic health records use policies should support the use of standardized terminologies to include ensuring that nursing staff receive adequate training on the use. Besides that, the electronic health records design should be user-friendly with a focus on ensuring that nursing information is accurate, relevant and complete (De Groot et al., 2020).
The journal article by De Groot and others is straightforward in presenting results of a study into the experience of nursing staff with the use of electronic health records and nursing terminologies. Based on the results, the authors recommend that electronic health records should have a user-friendly design with a focus on ensuring that standardized terminologies used have a positive impact on the extent to which nursing staff feel supported by the use of electronic health records. Significant strengths noted in the study are addressing a targeted issue, offering unbiased information, and making use of questionnaire as a reliable data collection tool. However, the study presents three weaknesses that can be addressed to include not providing a basis for comparison, the methodology lacks depth, and the methodology is inflexible. The critique makes a proposal to leverage the strengths and address the weaknesses. Overall, the study recommends that electronic health records design should be user-friendly, support the use of different standardized terminologies, and ensure that nursing staff are well trained on proper use of electronic health records.
BUY NOW A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748920300080?via%3Dihub Kim De Groot, Anke J.E. De Veer, Wolter Paans, Anneke L. Francke, Use of electronic health records and standardized terminologies: A nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Volume 104, 2020 The above article is the one chosen for this assignment A brief, 1- to 2-paragraph overview of the study that you selected. An explanation of two to three strengths of the study and support for your selection (i.e., why is this a strength?). Be specific. An explanation of two to three weaknesses of the study and support for your selection (i.e., why is this a weakness?). Be specific. Note: The strengths and weaknesses that you identified should be in relation to design, sampling, data collection, statistical analysis, results, and discussion of the study that you selected. An explanation of proposed changes that you would recommend to improve the quality of the study, capitalizing on the strengths and improving on the weaknesses that you identified in the study. Be specific and provide examples. A final summary of the implications of this study for nursing practice. “Use of electronic records and standardized terminologies:A nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences. International Journal of nursing studies,104 Please, include introduction and conclusion in every paper Use of Electronic Health Records and Standardized Terminologies Essays
De Groot, K., De Veer, A., Paans, W., & Francke, A. L. (2020). Use of electronic health records and standardized terminologies: A nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences. International journal of nursing studies, 104, 103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103523
Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier Inc.
Grove, S. K., & Gray, J. R. (2022). Understanding Nursing Research: Building an Evidence-Based Practice (8th ed.). Elsevier Inc.
Hall, H. R., & Roussel, L. A. (2022). Evidence-Based Practice: An Integrative Approach to Research, Administration, and Practice (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.
Kaakinen, J. R., Coehlo, D. P., Steele, R., & Robinson, M. (2018). Family Health Care Nursing: Theory, Practice, and Research (6th ed.). F.A. Davis Company.
Schmidt, N., & Brown, J. (2019). Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.
Suresh, S. (2018). Nursing Research and Statistics (3rd ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. Use of Electronic Health Records and Standardized Terminologies Essays